High Cost of CEPP in West Virginia
The Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) advanced by Congressional Democrats
as part of the proposed $3.5 trillion reconciliation package would have required electricity providers to increase the amount of carbon-dioxide-free electricity sold on their systems by 4 percent every year or pay penalties.
Media reports indicate that the CEPP may no longer be part of the reconciliation package due to the objections of West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin.
The removal of the CEPP from the reconciliation package is undeniably good news for Senator Manchin’s constituents because the proposal would have significantly increased the cost of electricity for West Virginia families and businesses, even if it had been amended to allow carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) equipment on coal plants or allowed unabated natural gas (UNG) to substitute for coal in an attempt to win Manchin’s approval.
Center of the American Experiment (American Experiment) has conducted a cost analysis
of complying with the CEPP under three different scenarios; a Renewable scenario, where wind and solar are used to meet carbon-free requirements, a CCS scenario, where existing coal-plants in West Virginia are retrofitted with CCS technology, and
a UNG scenario, where natural gas is allowed to substitute for coal-fired generation.
Achieving CEPP targets in West Virginia under the Renewable, CCS, and UNG scenarios would cost an additional $34.9 billion, $24 billion, and $6.1 billion, respectively (in constant 2021 dollars) compared to operating the current electric grid. Rising costs would cause electricity prices to increase by 25 percent in 2031 in the Renewable scenario, 22.5 percent for the CCS scenario, and 8 percent for the UNG scenario, compared to 2019 rates.
If borne by residential, commercial, and industrial electricity customers in West Virginia, rather than federal taxpayers, the additional costs imposed by the CEPP would be more than $1,100 per customer, $760 per customer, and $190 per customer per year through 2052 for the Renewable, CCS, and UNG scenarios, respectively.
Higher electricity prices would lead to higher costs for all West Virginians, but low-income households would be disproportionately hurt because these families spend a higher percentage of their income on energy bills relative to other West Virginia households.
West Virginia would also be harmed by meeting CEPP objectives under the Renewable scenario because it is a large exporter of coal-fired electricity supplied by West Virginia coal mines. As a result, a forced transition to wind and solar electricity would be a one-two punch to West Virginia’s economy by increasing the cost of electricity and destroying thousands of high-paying coal mining jobs in the state.
The CCS scenario could potentially increase the number of coal mining jobs in the state. The UNG scenario would likely create jobs in the natural gas industry because West Virginia is a large producer of natural gas— thanks to hydraulic fracturing (aka fracking). Rising natural gas industry jobs could help offset some of the jobs lost in the coal industry.
Click the “Download PDF” button to read the full report.