Is inflation lower in the Twin Cities because fewer people want to live here?
For a few months now, a common theme in the local media is that the inflation rate in the Twin Cities is lower than in comparable metropolitan areas. In October,…
St. Paul’s rent control ordinance is set to take effect beginning May 1. Yet there is no shortage of evidence showing how disastrous the ordinance has been. Housing permits are lower in St. Paul and housing projects are on pause.
Unfortunately, this is not all. According to a recent research study, in addition to reducing housing development, St. Paul’s rent control ordinance also reduced home values.
As the Star Tribune reports,
Early evidence suggests the passage of St. Paul’s new rent control law caused the growth rate of residential property values to lag behind other cities, according to an analysis of real estate transactions conducted by University of Southern California researchers.
While the city’s housing market remains competitive, with a shortage of listings driving prices up in recent months, economists Kenneth Ahern and Marco Giacoletti studied geographic and seasonal trends, building age, square footage and other variables to compare the change in St. Paul real estate prices following voters’ November approval of rent control to what other markets experienced during the same period.
They estimate that if voters had not passed a 3% annual cap on rent increases, residential property values would be 6-7% higher — a collective $1.6 billion.
“Prices tend to reflect what’s happening in the future,” Ahern said. “We know that in the future, rents are going to change. If I as an investor anticipate that, I’m not going to pay as much today for something that’s going to have less cash flows in the future.”
Ahern and Giacoletti used data from Redfin, an online real estate brokerage company, to look at nearly 150,000 Twin Cities-area transactions that took place between January 2018 and January 2022. The analysis focuses on one-to-four-unit properties and does not include large apartment buildings.
According to the study, while both owner-occupied and renter-occupied homes lost value, losses were more concentrated in areas with more rental property. Not to mention that these losses were also concentrated among individuals whom the ordinance was supposed to help — lower-income individuals.
Certainly, some tenants benefited from the ordinance. But this came at the expense of low-income property owners. As per the study,
tenants who gained the most from rent control had higher incomes and were more likely to be white, while the owners who lost the most had lower incomes and were more likely to be minorities
Once again, the potential loss in property value due to rent control is a side effect that American Experiment warned about before this ordinance was voted on.
Sadly, given that the ordinance is yet to go into effect, more disastrous consequences are still to follow.
When lawmakers legalized marijuana last session, they also set aside tens of millions of tax dollars to subsidize the marijuana industry. The bill that legalized marijuana, HF 100, instructed the…
Evan Ramstad at the Star Tribune wrote a great story highlighting the multitude of entirely foreseeable potholes that electric buses are hitting in towns across Minnesota. The piece is solid…
But you already knew that. Although he has not yet been charged in the Thanksgiving-eve fatal stabbing at an Edina bus stop, KSTP-5 has named the 32-year-old suspect in the…
Last week, the Fraser Institute published its annual Economic Freedom of North America report. The new edition, which looks at data from 2021, ranked Minnesota among the least free states…
The 2023 legislature set up a 13-member commission to redesign the Minnesota state flag and seal based on the false narrative that the design depicts a Native American on horseback…