Latest Posts





American Experiment Heads to DC: First Amendment Challenge Could Free All Public Employees from Forced Unionism

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday February 26 will hear the long-anticipated case brought by Mark Janus, an Illinois child support specialist who’s asking the Court to end mandatory “agency” or “fair-share” fees. The legal theory of the case is that all collective bargaining is political.

Policy fellow Catrin Thorman and I are headed to D.C. to witness this important event. I am going to stand in line in hopes of getting into the courtroom; Catrin is going to attend and speak at a rally on the courthouse steps. We will be joined by St. Paul educator, Aaron Benner.

Mr. Benner, who challenged the St. Paul school district discipline policy that limited his and the school’s authority to discipline minority students, and protect other students from problem classmates, will join us. Mr. Benner will be speaking about his experience as a due-paying union member, and how the union was not there for him when he needed representation.

Two years ago, I was in D.C. when Rebecca Friedrichs made the same legal argument to the Supreme Court, and asked the Court to reverse a terrible mistake made in 1977 that forced her and all public employees to subsidize the political speech of the teachers’ union. That day I felt called to be at the rally on the steps. This year, I am hoping to attend the hearing inside.

American Experiment joined Cato Institute and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) in an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule in favor of Mark Janus.

Several other briefs before the Court cite an opinion editorial of mine in The Wall Street Journal. I reported last fall how Education Minnesota, the teachers’ union, raised union dues by $14 in response to the Janus case in an effort to get teachers to sign an auto-renewal union card with a narrow opt-out window of only one week each year.

Teachers in Minnesota pay between $800 and $1,400 in dues annually. Education Minnesota and other government unions like AFSCME-5 charge “fair-share” fee payers, employees who do not belong to the union, about 85 percent of full union dues. Fair-share fee payers are only supposed to pay for the cost of collective bargaining, yet they cannot vote on the contract.

Does anyone really believe that Education Minnesota or AFSCME-5 are spending the bulk of their dues revenues on negotiating contracts? Everything the unions do, from collective bargaining, electioneering and lobbying, is inherently political because it affects taxes, spending and policies made by elected officials. No one should be forced to underwrite that.

In addition to asking the Court to overturn the 1977 case that sanctioned mandatory agency fees (Abood v. Detroit School Board), American Experiment and allied policy organizations are asking the Court to rule that a public employee’s right to opt out “does not become a dead letter” by clarifying that a union may only collect fees from non-members who give their affirmative consent.

If the Court overrules Abood, teachers and other public employees in Minnesota who want to opt out, could easily miss the narrow window—or find themselves caught in an annual contractual struggle with the union. Education Minnesota’s renewal agreement is an attempt to lock in union revenues of over $57 million a year. But if the unions do a good job, and focus on delivering value, they won’t need to trap people with sneaky fine print.

Data from Education Minnesota 2015-2016 LM-2

According to its federal LM-2 filing, Education Minnesota had revenues of about $57 million in 2015-2016. It spent about $21 million on salaries and benefits of its employees, including president Denise Specht who is paid about $184,000 a year.

The Center will release more data like this on Education Minnesota political spending over the next several months as part of its “EducatedTeachersMN” project.

The Court is expected to rule by the end of June. If it rules in favor of Mark Janus, teachers and other public employees in Minnesota will be able to opt out of paying dues. Since the unions are expected to make that process difficult, the Center will offer practical advice on how to opt out after we get the Court’s decision.

Stay tuned!





Upcoming Events

  • 2019 Annual Dinner Featuring Candace Owens

    Location: Hilton Minneapolis 1001 South Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403

    From Brexit to Blexit… Britain’s exit from the European Union has not been smooth sailing. Since the leave date has been pushed back to October, Nigel Farage is now running for a seat in the European Parliament. That election date is May 23 which has forced him to cancel all American speaking engagements, including our Annual Dinner. Center of the American Experiment is pleased to announce that Candace Owens, the founder of the Blexit movement and host of The Candace Owens Show, will now be presenting the keynote address at our 2019 Annual Dinner on May 18. We are excited…

    Register Now
  • The Diversity Delusion

    Location: Hilton Minneapolis 1001 South Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403

    Please join Center of the American Experiment on Wednesday, April 24th at the Hilton Hotel for a lunch forum with Heather Mac Donald as she discusses her new book, The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture.  Heather Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a contributing editor of City Journal, and a New York Times bestselling author. She is a recipient of the 2005 Bradley Prize. Mac Donald’s work at City Journal has covered a range of topics, including higher education, immigration, policing, homelessness and homeless advocacy, criminal-justice reform, and race…

    Register Now