Latest Posts





Why cigarette taxes don’t work

Last August, I asked ‘Why do we tax people?’ I reckoned that the most common answer would be ‘To pay for stuff’. But that is not the only reason governments levy taxes. Another is to discourage people from doing certain things. A tax, after all, is a negative incentive – if you tax something more, you get less of that thing. Outgoing Governor Mark Dayton embraced this logic when he supported higher cigarette tax rates, arguing that the cigarette tax “has been an effective tool in discouraging smoking, especially among young people”.

Not so fast. A 2012 paper for the NBER by economists Kevin Callison and Robert Kaestner asked the question ‘Do Higher Tobacco Taxes Reduce Adult Smoking?‘. They found that

Estimates indicate that, for adults, the association between cigarette taxes and either smoking participation or smoking intensity is negative, small and not usually statistically significant. Our evidence suggests that increases in cigarette taxes are associated with small decreases in cigarette consumption and that it will take sizable tax increases, on the order of 100%, to decrease adult smoking by as much as 5%.

Elasticities matter

Does this mean that taxes are not, in fact, negative incentives? Is Gov. Dayton barking up the wrong tree?

Note that Callison and Kaestner found that cigarette taxes did reduce smoking, just not by very much. Demand for cigarettes is ‘inelastic’, in other words. The left hand panel of Figure 1 illustrates this. An increase in price from P to Pt resulting from a tax increase produces a fairly small fall in the quantity demanded, from Q to Qt. Contrast this with a good for which demand is ‘elastic’, illustrated in the right hand panel. Here, a small increase in price, from P to Pt, produces a relatively large fall in quantity demanded, from Q to Qt.

Figure 1

If you’ve ever been a smoker you can probably understand why demand for cigarettes is ‘inelastic’ (I quit seven years ago after about 15 years). You’re addicted. If you don’t get a cigarette within a certain amount of time you get fidgety, your start fiddling with things. There is an element of physiological dependence. This is why quitting can be so hard. Considering all this, you will suck up a rise in price unless it is huge, as Callison and Kaestner found. Given this, to really impact smoking, cigarette taxes would need to be some way higher than they are now.

John Phelan is an economist at the Center of the American Experiment. 




Upcoming Events

  • Morning in Minnesota Breakfast Series Featuring Isaac Orr

    Location: The Oaks at Eagle Creek 1000 26th Ave NE Willmar, MN 56201

    Please join Center of the American Experiment on Tuesday, August 27th at The Oaks at Eagle Creek for breakfast with Center policy fellow and energy expert, Isaac Orr. Following his discussion of his new report, Doubling Down on Failure: How a 50 Percent by 2030 Renewable Energy Standard Would Cost Minnesota $80.2 Billion, Isaac will be joined by Rep. Tim Miller, Rep. Dave Baker, and Sen. Andrew Lang for a conversation about renewable energy standards in Minnesota. Tuesday, August 27, 2019 The Oaks at Eagle Creek 1000 26th Ave NE, Willmar, MN 56201 7:30 AM Breakfast & Check-In 8:00 AM Presentation…

  • Fall Briefing Featuring Kimberley Strassel

    Location: Ordway Center for the Performing Arts 345 Washington Street, St. Paul, MN 55102

    Purchase Tickets Here

    Register Now