Minneapolis crime spree heading into the new year
Despite all the talk about falling crime rates in the state’s largest city, we are ending the year on a bang. The latest incident to grab headlines was a shootout…
I attended the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission (SGC) roundtable discussion yesterday and voiced opposition to the commission’s consideration of eliminating the Custody Status Point (CSP) from the sentencing guidelines.
The CSP is used by judges to calculate criminal sentences in a more uniform and proportionate manner across the state.
The theory of the CSP is if someone commits a crime who is already on probation, parole, or in custody, that person should be held to a higher level of accountability than someone who isn’t under supervision. It’s been a long-held belief in Minnesota corrections, and it was acknowledged in the roundtable that most states also use some form of CSP when applying a new sentence to someone already under supervision.
In 2019 the SGC adjusted the CSP system by creating a new half point category for lesser offenses to add more proportionality — arguably a noble and reasonable adjustment. However, for technical reasons the half point can’t be accounted for in the current guidelines chart, and by rule it has simply rounded down, making is worthless.
Instead of fixing the technical issue that the SGC created itself, the SGC has used the opportunity to debate reducing the application of the CSP or even eliminating it all together.
This is the wrong move at the wrong time.
Minnesota has experienced an unprecedented rise in crime since 2018, with violent crimes increasing an incredible 49%. At the same time our prison population has decreased by 30%. Minnesota currently ranks 48 of 50 with the 3rd lowest rate of incarceration in the U.S. Our rate stands at 132/100,000, while the national average is 303/100,000.
The last thing our correctional leaders and the SGC should be considering at this time is further weakening the likelihood of repeat offenders staying behind bars.
Public comments at the end of the meeting were unanimous in their condemnation of the SGC’s consideration of such a move. It was clear listening to the passionate callers, most whom identified as crime victims, that many members of the SGC are out of touch with the fatigue the public is feeling towards crime — and more specifically towards our criminal justice system’s failure to place victims above criminals.
The statutes and the SGC’s own Statement of Purpose and Principle is clear: “The commission’s primary consideration shall be public safety.” Any move on the SGC’s part to further erode or eliminate the Custody Status Point from the sentencing guidelines is absolutely counter to its statutory and policy mandates.
NOTE: If you find this issue compelling, consider attending the SGC’s next meeting on Thursday 7/28. There will be a public comment session at that meeting as well. Follow this link for meeting updates.
Update: If you want to watch some of my comments from the roundtable, check out some of the videos below.
Last week, the Fraser Institute published its annual Economic Freedom of North America report. The new edition, which looks at data from 2021, ranked Minnesota among the least free states…
But you already knew that. Although he has not yet been charged in the Thanksgiving-eve fatal stabbing at an Edina bus stop, KSTP-5 has named the 32-year-old suspect in the…
When lawmakers legalized marijuana last session, they also set aside tens of millions of tax dollars to subsidize the marijuana industry. The bill that legalized marijuana, HF 100, instructed the…
Evan Ramstad at the Star Tribune wrote a great story highlighting the multitude of entirely foreseeable potholes that electric buses are hitting in towns across Minnesota. The piece is solid…
The legislature appropriates more money, the unions grab it for salaries, the school board cuts middle school band, and everyone blames the legislature for underfunding. Rinse and repeat.