New hunters’ rights group targets DNR wolf management
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has never enjoyed a high approval rating with many sportsmen and women. But the agency’s hands-off policy on the burgeoning gray wolf population in…
Now that’s a first!
Governor Walz yesterday vetoed a bill that would have raised prices for customers using ridesharing apps Uber and Lyft, and likely reduced demand for the services, drying up opportunities for the drivers. Walz will, however,
create a commission to study driver wages and working conditions with the expectation it will make recommendations for a bill in 2024.
So, it’s possible that another bill will pop up next year on this very same issue.
“I am committed to finding solutions that balance the interests of all parties, including drivers and riders,” Walz said in a release. “This is not the right bill to achieve these goals.”
The common-sense idea to first study the impact that the law would have before enacting it was also raised by Representative Pat Garofalo in the House floor discussion on May 17. However, the amendment was struck down. Gov. Walz is right to veto the bill. It would likely not work as intended and would instead raise prices, punishing riders as well as drivers.
There is just one problem. There is no evidence existing anywhere that the law would have been beneficial to drivers — at least not without some unintended consequences. In California, where a law was passed enacting some similar — albeit more extreme — provisions for independent workers, the results were negative. Numerous independent workers, in fact, applied to be exempt from the law.
Yet the bill moved all the way through the legislature. It only took pressure from Uber for Governor Walz to veto the bill. Similarly, a damaging bill to give nurses the power to mandate staffing levels over hospitals was struck down due to pressure from the Mayo Clinic.
Laws passed by the legislature have far-reaching consequences on businesses, residents, and workers. Minnesotans need to trust that their legislature will do the due diligence of passing laws only when there is clear evidence that such laws are necessary and will be beneficial. Yet that’s not what happened in this session. Numerous other laws, which will raise costs for Minnesotans and businesses, were passed without much deliberation.
This raises the question: Will Minnesota residents and workers have to rely on business pressure to save them every time a harmful bill comes up in the legislature?
Last summer, we went all over the state with our Off the Cliff tour. In it, we reviewed what had happened in the last legislative session in St. Paul. Among…
When lawmakers legalized marijuana last session, they also set aside tens of millions of tax dollars to subsidize the marijuana industry. The bill that legalized marijuana, HF 100, instructed the…
But you already knew that. Although he has not yet been charged in the Thanksgiving-eve fatal stabbing at an Edina bus stop, KSTP-5 has named the 32-year-old suspect in the…
Evan Ramstad at the Star Tribune wrote a great story highlighting the multitude of entirely foreseeable potholes that electric buses are hitting in towns across Minnesota. The piece is solid…
The legislature appropriates more money, the unions grab it for salaries, the school board cuts middle school band, and everyone blames the legislature for underfunding. Rinse and repeat.