The lessons of Prohibition in Minnesota
One hundred years ago today, the 21st Amendment to the Constitution was ratified, the first line of which read: The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United…
New government jobs bury the number created by manufacturers
One wonders when government will experience the same sort of productivity revolution that came to agriculture and manufacturing.
The United States lost 9,000 manufacturing jobs in October while gaining 19,000 jobs in government, according to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Government employment grew from 22,216,000 in September to 22,235,000 in October, according to BLS, while manufacturing jobs dropped from 12,267,000 to 12,258,000.
This chart plots the number of manufacturing employees and the number of government employees.
No wonder economic growth has slowed to a crawl.
Of course, the decline in manufacturing jobs doesn’t necessarily mean a decline in manufacturing. On the contrary, the value of goods made in America is higher than ever. Yet greater efficiency means that more goods can be produced with less labor. The good news is that the average job in manufacturing pays far better than it did decades ago, as workers reap the benefit of greater productivity.
Still, workers need jobs. Better government policies would enable more manufacturing production and more manufacturing jobs in the United States.
One wonders when government will experience the same sort of productivity revolution that came to agriculture and manufacturing. When will we see better government with fewer public employees? Perhaps never. Government, generally speaking, is a monopoly. Without competitive pressure, there is little incentive to improve productivity. On the contrary, there is a huge disincentive to cut government payrolls.
Many people don’t seem to realize that government itself has become a special interest–by far the largest and potentially most destructive special interest group of all. Government’s interests are promoted in part by government workers voting for political candidates who promise to spend more money. (To their credit, there are many public employees who do not vote for more government, but they are a minority.) Moreover, public employee unions are by far the largest funders of political campaigns–virtually always supporting candidates who call for more government.
The people in charge of government at all levels would generally prefer to see more employees, not fewer, and higher costs, not lower. Unlike the private sector, people who run governments do not bear the consequences of higher costs. Taxpayers do. Until taxpayers get serious about restraining the size and cost of government, look for the number of public employees to continue to rise.