Why can’t you find formula for your baby? Lockdowns and the FDA
A couple of weeks ago, I saw a post in a Facebook group for residents of my neighborhood where a desperate mother was asking if anyone knew a store that…
New Census Bureau population data show that Minnesota’s population grew by just 225 people in 2021. One particularly alarming aspect of this was a loss of 13,453 residents to other states. This was the our state’s biggest net loss of domestic migrants to other states in at least 30 years.
As Figure 1 shows, until 2001 Minnesota received more residents from other states each year than it lost to them. Since then, in all except two years, 2017 and 2018, our state has seen more residents leave than have chosen to come here from elsewhere in the United States. The loss of residents in 2021 might be especially large, but it is not a new development.
Figure 1: Annual net domestic migration in Minnesota
Source: Census Bureau
Where did people move to and from? Figure 2 shows domestic net migration for 2021 for all the fifty states and District of Columbia. We see that the most popular destinations by far were Texas and Florida. On net, these states gained an impressive 391,197 residents in one year. The big losers were New York and California. Together, these two states lost a staggering 719,484 residents between 2020 and 2021.
Figure 2: Net domestic migration, 2021
Source: Census Bureau
What is behind these patterns? As I argued in our recent report ‘Taxes and Migration – Minnesotans on the Move to Lower Tax States,’ taxes play a not-insignificant role in people’s decisions as to where to live, work, and invest. The analysis in that report is more rigorous, but it is telling that the average state and local sales, property, and individual income tax burden for New York and California in 2019 was 11.2 percent, while it was just 7.4 percent for Texas and Florida. Minnesota ranks 6th with a burden of 10.2 percent, so we shouldn’t be surprised to see this mass exodus of Minnesotans to other states.
But there is another factor at work here, I think. This data covers the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The measures taken to combat this virus differed greatly from state to state. Both New York and California have taken stringent measures in terms of lockdowns and masking requirements, while Texas and Florida have taken a more laissez-faire approach. To the extent that some of these moves have been driven by COVID-19 policy, it would seem that when they are voting with their feet, Americans generally prefer Ron DeSantis’s approach to Gavin Newsom’s.