John Thompson sued by Campaign Finance Board
The former DFL state representative from St. Paul’s District 67A owes more than $4,000 in fines and penalties to the state campaign finance regulator (CFB). The agency sued Thompson in…
On second thought, maybe it’s not such a great idea to force St. Cloud property owners to spend thousands of dollars on a regulatory program with a catchy title but little apparent support outside of those who want to punish landlords.
More than a dozen property owners and citizens unloaded on the St. Cloud City Council this week over City Hall’s plan to make the voluntary Eyes on the South Side rental property program a requirement to get certified by the city.
Their decision to go public led city councilors to back off at least in the short run, reports the St. Cloud Times.
To be validated in the Eyes on the South Side program, rental properties need to meet certain criteria such as adequate external lighting and deadbolt and window locks.
Because of the estimated cost to mandate the program for all rentals on the south side, city staff said the council could consider alternatives such as implementing Eyes on the South Side standards into routine rental inspections or adding incentives for voluntary participation.
City Administrator Matt Staehling said Monday city staff proposed a range of potential options — but noted those are not the only options. The council could decide to not make any changes or to go as far as to implement the program for all rentals in the city, he said.
The mandate would apply to nearly 450 rental properties with some 2,500 units, but evidently only to those on the south side of the city. The new regulations could cost landlords–and ultimately their tenants–an estimated $10,000. No surprise it’s been a bust as a voluntary program up to this point.
Mel Tadych, who said he has been a landlord for more than 30 years, told city officials he is opposed to more ordinances that will burden landlords and called the proposal “government intrusion.”
“I’m just opposed to any more mandated regulations,” he said.
Mary Mathews, who lives in the Southside-University Neighborhood, suggested possibly including some of the Eyes on the South Side criteria into a routine inspection process.
“A lot of it is pretty much common sense and should not require an elaborate program,” she said.
The mandate would also cost local taxpayers by bloating the city bureaucracy with two or three new workers needed to enforce the unpopular program. Yet at least one city council member hasn’t thrown in the towel yet.
Although [council member George] Hontos made the motion to table the vote, he made clear he is an advocate of the Eyes on the South Side program and has been a member of all of the neighborhood best practices task forces.
“We have some really bad landlords on the south side of St. Cloud,” Hontos said, adding that people who claim all landlords are doing their job “is baloney.”
Couldn’t the same thing could be said of the people who claim city councilors are doing their job by pushing this mandate?
When lawmakers legalized marijuana last session, they also set aside tens of millions of tax dollars to subsidize the marijuana industry. The bill that legalized marijuana, HF 100, instructed the…
Evan Ramstad at the Star Tribune wrote a great story highlighting the multitude of entirely foreseeable potholes that electric buses are hitting in towns across Minnesota. The piece is solid…
But you already knew that. Although he has not yet been charged in the Thanksgiving-eve fatal stabbing at an Edina bus stop, KSTP-5 has named the 32-year-old suspect in the…
Last week, the Fraser Institute published its annual Economic Freedom of North America report. The new edition, which looks at data from 2021, ranked Minnesota among the least free states…
The 2023 legislature set up a 13-member commission to redesign the Minnesota state flag and seal based on the false narrative that the design depicts a Native American on horseback…